| 
           2004: 
          STREAM IN CANYONLANDS NATIONAL PARK CLAIMED AS 'HIGHWAY' BY SAN JUAN 
          COUNTY 
           After a nearly decade-long campaign by conservation 
          groups, led by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, the National 
          Park Service closed Salt Creek inside Canyonlands National Park to 
          motor vehicles by regulation in June 2004. San Juan County and the 
          State of Utah have claimed the Creek as a "constructed highway" under 
          RS 2477. If their claim is recognized, it would degrade what the Park 
          Service calls "the most extensive perennial water source and riparian 
          ecosystem in Canyonlands National Park, other than the Green and 
          Colorado Rivers" as well as "the heart of the Salt Creek Archeological 
          District, the area with the highest recorded density of archeological 
          sites in the Park." The public can still access these wonders by less 
          damaging foot and horse travel.
          Read the Park Service's rule and
          learn more about 
          the Park. See the Creek 
          
          See a photo of the Salt Creek ‘highway’ and other bogus claims. 
           
          NOTE: Before and after photos showing the route after the route was 
          temporarily closed in 1998 can be viewed at pages 138 and 139 of the 
          NPS environmental analysis. 
           
          Although it has since been removed, there was a photo posted on the
          Boston University website showing a vehicle using the "road" that is 
          Salt Creek. 
          County and Utah Sue to Turn Creek into a Highway Despite Salt Creek's incredible values, San Juan County 
          thinks the Creek is a “constructed highway,” and that vegetation and 
          archeological resources there should be destroyed so that jeeps can 
          drive through the Creek. The county has sued to take control of the 
          creek as an RS 2477 right-of-way.
          Read a June 17, 2004 Salt 
          Lake Tribune story and a
          June 19, 2004, LA Times story. Read San Juan's
          complaint. Not to be outdone, the State of Utah has threatened to 
          file their own suit, attacking as "intolerable" the Park Service's 
          actions to protect Canyonlands' natural values and vowing to use and 
          maintain the route without Park Service approval. See the state's
          July 16 notice of 
          intent to sue.  
           The Park Service itself concluded in 2002 that the 
          alleged “constructed highway” did NOT meet the standard of a valid 
          right-of-way under RS 2477. The Park Service began a draft report, but never finalized 
          it. 
          The National Park Service is trying to keep conservation groups out of 
          San Juan County's lawsuit. Taken to its logical end, the NPS argument 
          could make it difficult for conservationists to challenge a Park 
          Service decision to give away rights-of-way across the entire U.S. 
          through a similar "Quiet Title" lawsuit.
          
          Read the agency's September 3, 2004 brief. The U.S. District 
          Court for the District of Utah denied conservation groups attempt to 
          intervene in the case in October 2004, but conservationists 
          immediately appealed the ruling to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. 
          That case is now being briefed.
          Read the opening brief of 
          conservation groups, filed in December, 2004. 
          April 2005 - the 
          State of Utah formally joins San Juan County's suit seeking to turn 
          the Creek into a highway. 
          Read the state's 
          complaint, which asks the court to permit the state to "maintain" 
          the "highway," including the right to put in culverts and other 
          "improvements. 
          August 30, 2005 -- in a major victory for conservationists, the 10th 
          Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that those who work to protect public 
          lands can have a seat at the table in court.
          Read 
          the court's ruling. 
          February 2006 - 
          the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals agrees to calls from the Park 
          Service and San Juan County to have the entire court rehear the 
          decision that awarded SUWA intervention.  Briefing on the issue was 
          completed in June 2006; the argument will occur the last week of 
          September 2006. 
          Conservationists, Media, and Off-Roaders Respond The National Parks Conservation Association found RS 
          2477 claims--including the claim at Salt Creek--to constitute a major 
          threat to Canyonlands National Park in a report the group prepared on 
          the health of that park. It posted a press release and report at its 
          website on September 9, 2004. Read a 
          September 10, 2004, Deseret News article on NPCA's report.  
          Read an editorial 
          from the Salt Lake Tribune, July 2, 2005, criticizing Governor Jon 
          Huntsman for siding with forces seeking to gain state ownership over 
          federal rights-of-way including Salt Creek. 
          June 2006 -- The Blue Ribbon Coalition, mouthpiece of the off-road 
          industry and users, boo-hoos the closure of Salt Creek in a
          commentary
          and an
          article 
          in its magazine. 
          2007: The Court Decides 
          The 
          Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled October 3, 2007 that the 
          public is allowed at the table when decisions about public lands are 
          made.
          
          Read an editorial in the Salt Lake Tribune.  |