| 
           NEWS 2005: APPEALS COURT RULES 
          UNCONSTRUCTED DIRT PATHS MAY BE STATE HIGHWAYS. In what appears to 
          be a major setback for those seeking to protect public lands from 
          bogus “highway” claims, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 
          ruling in a Utah RS 2477 case on September 8.  The opinion says 
          that Congress didn’t mean what it said when it required that 
          “highways” had to be “constructed.” Instead, the court concluded 
          “construction” meant nothing, and that federal courts must defer to 
          state law that allows ten years of use to establish a highway, whether 
          construction occurred or not.
          Read the 100+ page 
          opinion. Conservationists and Utah’s attorneys differed over the 
          wisdom of the decision. See the State of Utah's
          gloating press release and a
          September 
          9 and
          September 10
          article in the Salt Lake Tribune and a
          September 10 article in the 
          Deseret News.  Read a
          September 14 Salt 
          Lake Trib editorial urging restraint by Utah in pushing 
          seldom-used jeep tracks as highways. And read
          a response from the 
          drive-anywhere Blue Ribbon Coalition, urging members to celebrate 
          the opinion by driving on any claimed route they want -- a sure recipe 
          for mayhem and destruction of public lands values. 
          The case grew out of three Utah counties’ unilateral 
          action in using heavy equipment to “grade” 15 little-used jeep tracks 
          to nowhere. A federal district court in Utah in 2001 and again in 2004 
          had found reasonable BLM’s conclusion that when Congress said that RS 
          2477 rights-of-way had to be “constructed” with tools and lead to an 
          identifiable destination. Read a
          February 25, 2004, article  about a Judge Campbell’s 
          decision. Read the court's
          February 2004 ruling.   And Read a March 1, 2004, Salt 
          Lake Tribune
          editorial praising Judge Campbell's decision.  
          Conservationists are weighing seeking a rehearing from 
          the 10th Circuit and/or seeking review by the Supreme Court. If the 
          Tenth Circuit's decision is final, then the Utah district court will 
          have to use the new, nebulous standards for judging whether RS 2477 
          claims are valid. 
          UTAH COUNTIES & OFF ROAD GROUPS ARE PUSHING DIRT 
          TRACKS AS HIGHWAYS 
          Read how one county in Utah 
          is pushing off-road vehicle use on disputed roads  by 
          promoting an off-road 'jamboree' in or near numerous sensitive areas.  
          
          Read a July 2003 
          resolution adopted by the National Association of Counties at the 
          urging of Utah counties that says RS 2477 "highways" can be 
          constructed by kicking a rock or two out of the way 
          
          2003: SENATOR LIEBERMAN INVESTIGATES PLANNED ROUTE GIVE-AWAYS IN 
          THE GRAND STAIRCASE 
          On December 4, 2003, US Senator Joseph Lieberman asked the Interior 
          Department to hand over data concerning the agency's previous 
          "surveys" of routes that may become the subject of Utah RS 2477 
          claims.
          
          Read his letter and press release. 
          
          Read the December 5, 
          2003, Salt Lake Tribune article on Lieberman's letter. 
          2004: COUNTY, RENEGADE JEEPERS INVADE FRAGILE ARCH 
          CANYON  
          In early May 2004 a band of 30 Jeep jockeys – spurred 
          by a county official - entered Arch Canyon, near Blanding, Utah, 
          having been denied a permit by the Bureau of Land Management for their 
          caper. They cited RS 2477.  
          The U.S. Attorney’s office is now considering legal 
          action against the ringleaders of the jeep invasion.
          Read a June 18, 2004 story.
           
           |