The RS2477 Threat

Lands at Risk

Threats to
Private Property

Solutions

Resources

Act Now!

 

 

 

 
 
→Rep. Udall did not introduce his amendment to de-fund the RS2477 loophole but he did receive a promise of rigorous Congressional oversight of future claims, a step forward. Read articles from the Salt Lake Tribune and the Land Letter.

Read more about the impact of R.S. 2477 and wilderness from the Salt Lake Tribune and read Heidi McIntosh's, of SUWA, opinion in the Tribune.

Read Representative Udall's response to the Colorado Springs Gazette's article about his amendment.

 

 

READ THE AMENDMENT

 

WHAT THE AMENDMENT WOULD DO.

The Udall Amendment to the 2007 Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill would de-fund the archaic R.S. 2477 (learn more about R.S. 2477) loophole that grandfathers "highway" rights-of-way on claims made back when the old law existed.

WHY WE NEED PROTECTION.

The Administration invites a land rush by using the R.S. 2477 loophole to give away valuable lands that belong to all Americans (check out just some of the wild places at risk). Individual states, local governments and private interests benefit at the expense of our federal tax dollars.  What's worse, all this land is up for grabs without environmental review or meaningful public input. Many of these so-called highway claims cross National Parks, Monuments, Wildlife Refuges, Wilderness, and other wild, untouched lands treasured for their natural qualities, quiet recreation opportunities, and historic and cultural resources.

Representative Udall's amendment would take away the tax dollars that pay for this Administration's give-away of our public lands.

WHAT'S HAPPENING WITHOUT THIS PROTECTION.

The Administration has developed two ways to give away highway rights-of-way under R.S. 2477.

  • On January 6, 2003, the Administration revised the Interior Department’s disclaimer of interest regulations as a way to hand over R.S. 2477 highway claims to states, counties, and interest groups. Click here for more on the disclaimer rule.

 

  • On March 22, 2006, former Interior Secretary Gale Norton in her final days in office released a hastily-crafted policy that appears to be another attempt to promote road development across federal lands with perfunctory agency oversight rather than establish a thoughtful process for validating R.S. 2477 rights-of-way claims. Click here for more on the Norton policy.

The Administration's policies threaten Congressional protections for National Parks, Wildlife Refuges, Wilderness, National Forests, Wild and Scenic Rivers, and sensitive lands across the West.

WHAT'S AT RISK.

Lands all across the west are at risk.  Check out:

The Mark Udall Amendment would help ensure that claims to public lands rights-of-way are legitimate.  Please support the Amendment.

 

Read statements from groups supporting the amendment:

-League of Conservation Voters

-Private property owners

-FORTY-ONE conservation, wildlife, recreation, and cultural resource protection groups.

-The Salt Lake Tribune

-Retired National Park Service Employees

-The Outdoor Industry Association

-Archeologists and scholars

-the Interior Department's former chief lawyer

-Colorado local elected leaders

-Fourteen conservation groups' ad in "Roll Call"

 

TAKE ACTION!: Call or email your representative in Washington, it's easy to do right now at:

EARTHJUSTICE

SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE

THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY

 

 HOME